Thursday, July 26, 2012

It's a nice dream

I was in Pennsylvania last year when the sex scandal at the University became public knowledge and I had a chance to read the indictment laying out the State’s case. I was appalled by the actions of the assistant football coach (who’s name I don’t want to mention) but more disturbed by the inaction of the University when the case was brought to their attention several years previously. As bad as the criminal acts were the fact that the school chose to ignore the event, hoping that it would “just go away” is what made me truly angry. In addition, the actions and comments of the school’s supporters were disturbing when they defended the accused and the school, usually with a claim that no lasting harm had been done. For that I call BS because there are more than a few damaged children now having to live with the results of the actions that were perpetrated on them.

Today I’m equally offended by the NCAA sanctions that many claim to be “too harsh”. In my opinion the school should be outlawed and forbidden to engage in any inter-collegiate sport equal to the period of time the pedophile was allowed to operate within its walls without being halted by informed and knowledgeable school officials who chose instead to sweep the scandal under the rug. From trial testimony that appear to be a time span of 14 years.  The school officials who decided to allow a culture of pedophilia to flourish should be removed and, at best lose their livelihood and their pensions.

Who knows…maybe if that were done the school’s costs would go down, tuition could be lowered and the students could concentrate on the academics that brought them to the school in the first place. I know it won’t happen, but it’s a nice dream.

Wednesday, July 18, 2012

To Protect the innocent, names have been changed

Le Conteur and I have been sitting pets the past few days while close friends are off visiting her family. For at least a few days James will be able to have some time for himself…for he is the full time caregiver for his long time friend and wife. She has a long term debilitating disease that has a negative impact on their lives, but despite the disease that is wracking her body and mind. Peggy is a lovely lady who unfortunately needs 24 hour care and attention and James loves his wife with enduring passion and is more than willing to give of himself so that he can be there for his lady when she needs him. Le Conteur and I both marvel at his dedication and look within ourselves for strength that equals James.

Both James and Peggy love their pets, two large doges and three dependant cats, and my story is about one of the dogs. Shadow is an elderly Lab who has severe arthritis and finds it difficult to walk, because of Peggy’s issues (which take up most of James’s time) Shadow doesn’t get out often and has taken to falling when she tries to move around. So one of the things we do each day is to take her for a short walk when we go over to visit the pets several times each day. And the results have been amazing…Shadow, after only a few opportunities to explore the outside world is now walking without stumbling and wants to take a walk before anything else. She is alert and active and her inner puppy is expressing itself.

We don’t know what the long term will be for the dog, but it has proven to us that even a little bit of change and exercise is good for both body and soul.

Thursday, July 5, 2012

Small Town 4th

There are 105 counties in Kansas with a 2011 population of 3,993.000 and the county I live in has 552,991 of those people. It is an "urban county" by any definition but if you look hard enough in this up scale, slightly yuppified county you can still find pockets of rural life that struggle on and, without shame, live by the ethics and culture that are the foundation of this singular republic.
As many socially responsible citizens do I volunteer with our Sheriff's department since I'm getting just a little too old for the fire and rescue game. As a volunteer I'm given the opportunity to support the police in doing their job, and yesterday I spent part of the day directing traffic for a 4th of July parade in an unincorporated area of the county that is working hard to keep its rural character.


Instead of fancy floats and marching bands I was privileged to watch 4H clubs marching several miles in the plus 100 degree heat, farm tractors pulling trailer loads of white haired service clubs and very vocal high school football teams. There were service trucks from local business advertising their availability and (of course) the obligate local politicians eager to get your vote. Kids riding on hay bales and adults riding quarter horses made for a fun time for everyone. Sspectators and participants were all having a grand time and it was a taste of small town Americana that I don't often get a chance to see any more and I feel the better for watching people come together to enjoy themselves, wave the flag and socialize with friends and neighbors.
My faith in the future of our society was made stronger by the opportunity to go back in time to a period that wasn't ashamed to admit its love of country.

Sunday, July 1, 2012

Health Care and the People

I am supposed to be a neutral and un-biased participant, engaged in helping others resolve whatever issues brought them to me. If truth be told I don’t believe that any one can be “neutral”, we always have an opinion, but I can be fair and impartial when I’m working as a mediator.

One of the tricks of mediation I use is never to jump to a conclusion, think about the issues, consider the arguments advanced by the parties, contemplate options, visualize end points and only then start to guide the conversation towards a solution. The important thing is to be deliberate in the process and never rush to a decision. It doesn’t work every time, I am after all subject to human emotions and have been known to make mistakes. But slow and steady is usually a good way to go. And when it comes to the governments “Affordable Health Care Act” also known as Obama-care, it pays not to hurry to a conclusion.

The decision of the Supreme Court that the legislation is essentially constitutional energized some and enraged others. Very few people don’t have an opinion, and it's usually a strongly held opinion. But after thinking about the decision and doing some research I’ve reached the conclusion that the Supreme Court decision was a brilliant step that is designed to encourage the parties to further dialog and an eventual resolution that will allow the parties to be content with their decision.

There are key elements in the Courts decision that I see as essential to the future of this Republic. The administration pushed the legislation under the 14th Amendment (known as the Commerce Clause) but this argument was set aside in the majority opinion that stated that a mandated penalty levied on individuals who declined health insurance was not appropriate but that it was within the power of Congress to levy a tax on people who declined to purchase health insurance. So it seems that it’s no longer possible for Congress to pass legislation based on 14th Amendment arguments. It must now pass any future legislation that establishes penalties solely on its ability to tax…and that’s a much higher and more complex bar to surmount when Congress establishes ways to fund the laws it passes.

Personally Le Conteur and I pay a monthly premium of about $800 for a very good comprehensive family health care plan. Under Obama-care it was mandated that the penalty for the uninsured should be $95 per year. Having to fund the program via taxation will certainly change that figure to something closer to what we now pay for our insurance and I shudder to think what will happen to my taxes when the costs for the half of the population that doesn’t pay any taxes are lumped into our annual tax bill. I think the conversation on the health care bill has really just started and that the administration will be hard pressed to defend the program when the true costs are calculated and become public knowledge.

In addition the decision stated that it is not constitutional to penalize states who decline to participate in the program by cutting off the funding for other federally supported programs. In effect, the tiger is now toothless since 25 states were party to the suit that came before the Supreme Court. There are also interesting ramifications such as if a state were to decide that it is ok for its citizens to drink at age 18 it could no longer be penalized by the loss of all highway funds…I think we will be hearing some interesting and long winded Congressional debates in the future.

In effect the court tossed the problem back to the administration and Congress saying “Here are the problems and now you have to fix it” So for those who have issues with the Supreme Court decision I will merely say that ultimately it will be seen as a brilliant maneuver to get Congress to do the job as set forth in the Constitution.

My own opinion is, to paraphrase a long dead Roman:

                           Obama-care delinde est.



Wednesday, June 27, 2012

EPA and those who don't listen

The Environmental Protection Agency apparently has a regulation on the books that requires refiners to add cellulosic ethanol to the fuel they produce. But the refiners are not adding the chemical because they say the product doesn’t exist in commercial quantities. In other words it’s a laboratory creation and is too expensive to make in large quantities. EPA press releases say that they expected cellulosic ethanol to be available at the time the regulation went into effect, but that didn’t happen and the agency is refusing to reevaluate its position. It must be nice to require an unavailable product and then hold producers accountable when the product isn’t unavailable!

I did a short internet search and found that cellulosic ethanol is not made from corn, but instead uses grasses such as switch grass, hemp, assorted plant waste and/or wood chips to produce alcohol. These are all non food products and it certainly makes sense to convert them to a fuel additive but it seems to be an expensive process because the conversion requires sugar and these items don’t have a lot of convertible sugar within their cellular structure. There is a research outfit that has been trying since 2001 to develop an enzyme that will cheapen the process but to date they have been unsuccessful. Since they have been doing this under a contract with EPA it boggles the mind that EPA didn’t pay attention. An agency that doesn’t pay attention to the real world is not something we need to listen to in these times.

Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Silent Spring

My Lady wanted to paint the sun room and in order to get a good match with the existing paint we drove to a neighborhood paint store to buy a gallon of the right color paint. It was a sobering moment when we paid over $50 for a can of water, colorant and a bit of chemical designed to make the paint effective yet able to meet the standards inflicted by officialdom. We talked about the exorbitant price and after some discussion settled on the fact that 30 years ago the same paint sold for about $6 to $10 dollars a gallon.  Out side inflation (which would have brought the price to a $15 to $25 range) The reason for the steep increase in price is, to us obvious. It’s the cost of doing business while be hectored, lectured and regulated out of business by the Environmental Protection Administration.

The EPA and other environmental watchdog and big brother agencies such as the Consumer Product Safety Commission have been taken over by extreme environmentalists who profess to know better than we do and insist that we follow their prescription for a “better world”. While there are many industrial practices that have been improved by regulation in truth the programs and edicts of these people have probably killed more people in the past century than the environment ever thought of.

Fifty years ago a book by Rachel Carson was published, it came at a time the knowledgeable world was becoming aware of the complex interaction of the globe we inhabit and was starting to respond to that wisedom. “Silent Spring” has been given credit with empowering the environmental movement and its unfounded fear of any and all pesticides, especially DDT.

Paul Muller, the inventor of DDT received a Nobel Prize in 1948 in recognition of the role the pesticide played in saving hundreds of thousands of lives of troops fighting the Axis Powers in World War II. It killed the insects that spread Typhus and other diseases and it did so without any evidence supporting the unproven threat of cancer that Carson advanced through her book. When “Silent Spring” was published DDT was already famous for protecting human health along with a whole range of agricultural chemicals that protected crops against the depredation of insects, rodents and weeds. Some of the problems associated with pesticides had already been identified and science was working on ways to resolve those problems but as a result of political pressure from “progressives” in 1972 the United States banned the sale and use of DDT based solely on the claims of undue risk that Carson put forward in her book. Despite warnings from public health officials in the US, the World Health Organization and the Pan American Health Organization the ban went into effect and the result has been the death of literally millions of human lives.

Carson opened  “Silent Spring”, with a chapter titled “A Fable for Tomorrow”, she invented a town so poisoned by insecticide that no birds could live, nest or sing there, I remember reading the book when it first came out and I admit to being horrified by her description of a dying town. But her story is pure fiction. Subsequent studies have demonstrated that the die-off she described has never happened. Years of bird counts have not pointed to any mass die off of birds or any other life forms other than the pest the insecticide targets. In the US the first agricultural pesticides were initially regulated by Congress in 1910 and generations of scientists and farmers took care to avoid contaminating crops for obvious reasons.

Fifty years after the book’s publication we are experiencing a coast-to-coast plague of bedbugs that has occurred in the past decade and continues today. The problem could have been eliminated if DDT was still in use. The media, which has covered the “bedbug problem” extensively, has never mentioned this salient fact, or the fact that the EPA has just one pesticide registered for use against bedbugs and routinely refuses to allow licensed pest control professionals to use it.

Malaria, once on the brink of being eliminated, has made a dramatic resurgence since the ban of DDT.

These events, and others that could be mentioned are Rachel Carson’s true and lethal legacy.

“Silent Spring” is the base document for the programs that so much of the environmental movement advocates. Ranging from the United Nations to non-governmental-organizations like Greenpeace, the Sierra Club, Friends of the Earth, the World Wildlife Fund, and dozens of others their programs always seems to end up killing people in the name of saving the Earth.

Throughout history there have been a few books that doomed millions to death. “Das Capital” by Karl Marx kicked off the worst economic system of the modern era, claiming the lives of millions of Russians and Chinese, along with others in the process.

Hitler’s “Mein Kampf” mobilized Nazi Germany, led to World War Two in Europe, and was responsible for the deliberate killing of over 11 million Jews and Christians in its concentration camps, not counting the millions more in war dead.

I think it interesting that the Nazi leaders were ardent environmentalists, and wonder if we are not seeing a resurgence of their philosophy of wanting to  kill off all those who do not agree with the progressive vision for the future.

Wednesday, June 13, 2012

Oh the Horror!

Those of you who know me are aware that I occasionally enjoy a wee dram of single malt. After a difficult mediation, be it a couple fighting over the dog, someone complaining about a noisy neighbor or two businesses disputing a contract, I frequently relax over a glass of Scotch after enjoying one of Le Contours gourmet meals. It’s a fine way to end a day…a memorable meal, a peaty malt libation, a good book and My Lady in my life.

But the pleasant routine of days end has been threatened by the closure of one of Scotland’s distilleries by the threat of Legionnaires disease. The bacterium that causes this severe form of pneumonia was found in the cooling tower at the North British Distillery in Edinburgh and the plant has been shut down. To a dedicated drinker of Scotland’s finest export the news of the plant closure and the implication that other distilleries might be contaminated is akin to being told the end of the world is approaching.

The disease is usually transmitted by inhaling the bacteria and the practice of dedicated drinkers of Scotch to inhale the fragrance of the product before enjoying its taste makes enjoying what should be a pleasant end of day ritual a potentially dangerous practice.

Fortunately for me the output of this particular distillery is sold to other companies and is used for blending purposes. So if you enjoy such blends The Famous Grouse, J&B Rare, Johnnie Walker,  Black Label and Cutty Sark you might want to enjoy your drink without inhaling its bouquet for at least the near future, say 12 to 20 years!

As for me, I’m still enjoying my single malts, made by small distillers in a tightly controlled environment and worth every penny of the cost, but I might just sniff my glass gently rather than inhaling.