Saturday, February 16, 2013

The Peter Principle

Two events demonstrate the hubris of the political class in this country. Nancy Pelosi has come out as opposed to the congressional pay cut that is mandated by the administration proposed sequestration as "undermining the dignity of the job". I wonder what the reaction would be if I used that same statement if someone offered me a reduction in salary! Of course her comment comes on the heels of a statement she made last week that the economy was not in trouble because of "overspending", it needed just needed adjusting because of a "budget deficit".

The best illustration of political hubris came while watching the State of the Union dog and pony show. One Australian writer compared the attitude and actions of Mr. Obama to the actions of Captain Queeg in the novel.  "The Caine Mutiny". For those of you who have not read the book it is a beautiful description of a naval officer who has been promoted beyond his level of competence and freezes up when presented with events he has no understanding of or ability to react to. Queeg almost allows his ship to founder when he refuses to take any action other than to repeat previous orders that have proved ineffective during a typhoon.

Faced with what looks like an epic fiscal typhoon Mr. Obama has done nothing at all other than repeating pseudo-Keynesian fiscal mantra that are nothing more than repetition of failed ideas. His inability to recognize the issues his policies have created suggest that he is seriously deficient in mental agility and certainly unwilling to listen to other opinions and suggestions.

Watching him I'm struck by his visible lack of concern and his smug, self evident sense of his own greatness
His programmatic response to the coming debacle is to blame others and to ask for increased taxes on those he calls "the rich". A cursory look at economics reveals, to me, that there are not enough "rich" people to  lower the debt to any measurable extent.

The Laffer Curve, as applied in President Reagan's administration demonstrated quite well that the way to improve the economy and lower the deficit is to lower taxes. But the political class in this country is committed to the idea that only by doing the same failed thing over and over will the economy improve.

That's not economics....that's insanity.

Monday, February 4, 2013

Damn Their Eyes

The past few weeks I've been dealing with insurance problems and I'm becoming expert on the things insurance people can do to keep from paying a claim. Granted the greater proportion of claims are paid in a timely manner but in every industry there are people who seem to delight in making life hard for those they deal with.

The National Flood Insurance Program is a federally mandated and underwritten program that is administered by FEMA who ultimately pay out on all flood damage claims. Commercial insurance companies and local agents write and service flood policies but their risk is minimal and their economic exposure is infinitesimal. Nevertheless I have had scores of people telling me about their issues with the insurance company.

Could you produce a sales receipt for the coach you bought 20 years ago? And if you could find where you had filed that ancient receipt what do you do when all your records were washed away in the flood. But it seeems to be a requirement by some companies that if you can't produce a receipt for every item they will deny the entire claim...until you can prove when you bought and how much you paid for the item.

Then there are the companies that claim that their adjuster, the person who looked at your loss and wrote it up has never sent them the paperwork. Three months later and they never bother to tell you that their agent failed to do his job! And of course there are the companies who just never perform. The client keeps calling and they always tell them "next month" until someone (usually the client) gives up in dispair after using his own funds to pay for repairs the insurance is supposed to cover.

None of this is FEMA's fault, they are depending on the insurance companies to do their job. But when the client is at the end of their tether they usually end up talking to me since I'm usually the first human contact they can reach. I can help, I can refer to higher authority, but I cannot give the people back the time they have lost while waitng for the insurer to do the job in a timely manner.

That's not the worst of the crimes some companies commit. All mortgage companies require that purchesers of property within a defined flood zone have both property and flood insurance in force. It's logical that they want to protect their invesment. On more than one occasion I've been approached by a homeowner who was sold "flood insurance" by their mortgage ccomapany, with the particiption of an insurance company that was nothing more than a declining balance mortgage insurance. After the flood has totaled their home the couple who had been sold "flood insurance", and it said so in bolded letters on the insurance policy get a letter saying that the mortgage on their house had been paid off and that they were responsible for any and all repairs to the house.

Words fail me.